Ground leases are an essential - if somewhat uncommon - part of the realty finance industry. Because they typically cover big costly residential or commercial properties like Rockefeller Center and The Empire State Building, to call 2, and last a very long time (99 years and approximately begin) the probability of something unanticipated or unexpected occurring is high. This likelihood increases significantly if, as highlighted listed below, one or both of the lease celebrations' declare insolvency. Accordingly, genuine estate experts ought to bear in mind and make sure when entering into any deal including a ground lease.

* * * *

Ground leases have actually been around considering that the Middle Ages and personal bankruptcy laws have actually existed given that a minimum of Roman Times. Given this long history, it is not a surprise that a great deal of law has established on the interplay of personal bankruptcy and ground leases. This is particularly so because the advent of the "contemporary" United States Bankruptcy Act in 1898 and the extensive modifications to title 11 of the United States Code implemented to it in 1978, when Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Code") was enacted. [1] In particular, Section 365 of the Code provides unique guidelines for the assumption or rejection of a ground lease-as well as its possible sale and transfer by a debtor to a 3rd celebration.

Knowing these rules is critical to any real-estate expert. Here are the fundamentals:

A ground lease, often described as a "land lease," is a distinct mechanism for the advancement of commercial real estate, delighted in by those charged with developing the Rockefeller Center and the Empire State Building, for example. The plan enables for extended lease terms frequently approximately 99 years (with the option of renewal) for the landowner to maintain ownership of the land and gather rent while the designer, in theory, may surpass the land to its benefit too. Both historically and currently, this atypical relationship in the real estate space produces ample conversation weighing the structure's benefits and drawbacks, which naturally grow more complicated in the face of a ground lessor or ground lessee's bankruptcy.

According to a lot of courts, consisting of the Second Circuit, the limit concern in examining the aforementioned possibilities regarding a ground lease in bankruptcy court is whether the ground lease in question is a "real lease" for the function of Section 365. Section 365 applies, making the ground lease eligible for, presumption or rejection, just if it is a "real lease." [2] While just what constitutes a "real lease" will vary state by state, it is extensively accepted that "the proper questions for a court in identifying whether § 365 [] governs an agreement fixing residential or commercial property rights is whether 'the parties planned to enforce responsibilities and confer rights significantly different from those arising from the ordinary landlord/tenant relationship.'" Intl. Trade Ad. v. Rensselaer Polytechnic, 936 F. 2d 744 (2d Cir. 1991). This "intent" is figured out based upon that of the celebrations at the time of the lease's execution. In re Big Buck Brewery Steakhouse, Bkrptcy No. 04-56761-SWR, Case No. 05-CV-74866 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2006). Despite there being "a 'strong presumption that a deed and lease ... are what they purport to be,'" the economic compound of the lease is the primary decision of whether the lease is considered "true" or not, and in some states (like California), is the only suitable element to weigh. Liona Corp., N.V. v. PCH Associates (In re PCH Associates), 804 F. 2d 193 (2d Cir. 1986) mentioning Fox v. Peck Iron & Metal Co., 25 Bankr. 674, 688 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1982). Generally, the more away those "economic truths" are from the common landlord/tenant relationship, the less most likely a lease will be thought about a "true lease" for the purpose of Section 365. Id. For instance, if residential or commercial property was bought by the lessor particularly for the lessee's use or solely to protect tax advantages, or for a purchase price unrelated to the land's worth, it is less most likely to be a real lease.

If the ground lease remains in reality figured out to be a "real lease" (and based on court approval), the designated trustee or debtor-in-possession in a personal bankruptcy case may then either presume or reject the lease as it would any other unexpired lease held by the debtor.

However, exceptions apply. These heavily depend on a debtor's "adequate guarantees" to the remaining celebrations to the contracts. Section 365 of the Code offers that if there has actually been a default on a debtor's unexpired lease, the DIP may not presume the abovementioned lease unless, at the time of presumption, the DIP: (i) remedies or offers "adequate guarantee" that they will in truth "quickly cure [] such default"